THE 456th FIGHTER INTERCEPTOR SQUADRON

THE  PROTECTORS OF  S. A. C.

 

Click on Picture to enlarge

joeinflightsuitopt.jpg (34601 bytes)
An all leather flight suit

 

The History Of Flight Suits

+ Larger Font | - Smaller Font

 

The Flight Suit

 

Click on Picture to enlarge

A flight suit worn by an SR-71 Blackbird pilot, now in an Air Force museum.

A flight suit is a full body garment, worn while flying a powered aircraft such as military airplanes and helicopters. These suits are generally made to keep the wearer warm, as well as being practical, and durable (including fire retardant). Its appearance is usually similar to a jumpsuit. A military flight suit may also show rank insignia. It is sometimes used as a combat uniform in CQB or VBSS situations, for its practicality.

 

History

As aviation developed, the need for warm clothing quickly became apparent, as did the need for multiple pockets with closures of either buttons, snaps, or zippers to prevent loss of articles during maneuvers. Various types of flight jackets and pants coverings were developed and, during World War I, leather two-piece outfits were common among pilots to ward of the chill caused by propwash and the cold of low-oxygen altitude flying. Leather quickly became the preferred material due to its durability and the protection it offered against flying debris such as insect strikes during climb-outs and landings, and oil thrown off by the simple rotary and inline motors of the time. By the time World War II started in earnest, electrically-heated suits were introduced for patrol and bomber crews who routinely operated at high altitudes above 30,000 feet, where air temperatures could get so cold that flesh could freeze instantly to any metal in which it came in contact. As pressurized cabins came into operation, the necessity of wearing bulky leather and shearling jackets and pants began to fade. For example, pilots, navigators, and bombardiers of a B-17 operating in Europe in 1944 would wear their officer's uniforms under an A-2 flight jacket comfortably due to the enclosed and heated cabin, but the waist gunners would have to wear electrically-heated suits as they fired their guns through open window gunports. When the Superfortress was introduced in the fight against Japan, the fully-pressurized cabin made the necessity of bulky flight gear obsolete.

Where bomber pilots could get away with wearing their dress uniforms as flight gear, fighter pilots needed a uniform that functioned in the tight confines of the typical fighter plane cockpit. The AN-S-31 flight suit was developed for the US Army Air Corps and featured two button-down breast pockets and two button-down shin pockets that could be accessed from the sitting position. The US Navy used a different model that featured slanted pockets with zippers. Material used was either wool or tight-weave cotton for wind resistance.

The need for short-duration fire protection was demonstrated early during that war. Naturally following the development the flight suit, fireproof helmets, goggles, masks, gloves and footwear where designed and used. The footwear often could be cut to appear like civilian shoes in the country where the crew member would land if shot down.

Flak jackets were also developed to give bomber crews some protection from flying shrapnel.

With the era of jet flight and improved focus on safety, however, fully fire-retardant and warmer materials were required. It was also simpler to make a one-piece suit when it would potentially have to fit over existing clothing or various types of under-garments.

Also, with the coming of jet flight came the development, in Canada, of the G-suit, a special kind of flight suit (worn alone or in combination with a traditional flight suit) that protected the wearer from the physical stress of acceleration, by compressing the body to keep blood from pooling in the legs, thus starving the brain of oxygen.

In the 1950s and 1960s even more specialized suits needed to be developed for high-altitude and space flight. These would include full pressurization, and would be the precursor to today's space suits.

 

Current Standards

The current flight suit that is standard for most Air Forces is made of Nomex a fabric made from a spun aramid. The flame retardant capabilities of this material make it ideal for protecting aviators in case of a fire. The suit is often green in color, but color, style, and cut vary greatly from country to country. Flight suits can lead to a condition known as "tanker leg", an embarrassing condition during which the leg of a Nomex flight suit gets caught up on the back of the flight boot and does not hang free.

 

Space Flight

NASA astronauts have worn one-piece flight suits when in training or on flights in their NASA T-38s. The current flight suit worn by astronauts is Royal blue, made of Nomex. The now common "shirt-sleeve" environment of the orbiting Space Shuttle and ISS has resulted in much more casual attire during spaceflight such as Shorts and polo shirts. In the pre-challenger era, shuttle crews wore light blue flight suits and an altitude helmet during launch/reentry. Apollo Crews wore white 2-piece beta cloth uniforms during non-essential activities and the full A7L pressure suit during Launch, TLI, Lunar Ascent/Decent, and EVAs. Mercury and Gemini crews wore their pressure suits for the duration of the mission with the exception of Gemini 7.

 

Colors

Pilots and flight crews use several colors of flight suit. NASA crews, for example, wear blue flight suits as a sort of functional dress uniform during training. The orange suits that they wear during launch and reentry/landing are designed for high visibility should there be an emergency recovery. White suits are worn during space walks to control temperature.

Wikipedia,

 

 

Evolution of the American High Altitude Pressure Suit 

Supporting Life at 80,000 feet:

by Christopher T. Carey

 

Click on Picture to enlarge

It was a typical sun-drenched late morning at Edwards Flight Test Center in Mojave, California. The Physiological Support Division (or PSD, as it is commonly known) technician was demonstrating how an SR-71 crew member eats while maintaining a flight profile of 2,400 miles per hour at 80,000 feet, squeezed into the multi-layered high altitude pressure suit that includes a helmet assembly with a sealed visor. In the Sergeant's hand was an aluminum tube in the shape of a toothpaste container. The tube contained something vaguely resembling apple sauce in consistency, that the pilot squeezed--via a connector probe--through a special port in the front part of the David Clark Company pressure helmet. "At three times the speed of sound," the Sergeant explained, "the outer skin of the canopy of the SR-71 Blackbird reaches temperatures in excess of 550 degrees Fahrenheit. All you have to do, if you want hot apple sauce for lunch at that speed, is hold the tube against the inner canopy glass for a few seconds." He held up the aluminum tube with its cylindrical snout and pressed out a dollop for us to see. "Voila....hot apple pudding!" 

 

The marvel that is the current David Clark-produced S1031C Pilot Protective Assembly (or PPA for short) pressure suit--used by crewmen who fly the fastest and highest flying jet aircraft in the world--is not quite entirely taken for granted by pilots who depend upon it for survival at the fringes of space. After all, any thing that takes a little over half an hour to get dressed up in tends to make an impression on the wearer. However, the ease with which the suit accomplishes its task of protecting man from the hostile environment he flies in might seem to belie its complexity and the amazing history of decades of mainly American research and development which preceded it. 

 

Historically speaking, the remote ancestors of today's high altitude full pressure suit are to be found in the full coverage, dry diving outfits of turn-of-the-century commercial salvage divers, with their ported brass helmets and valve fittings. Despite these superficial similarities, while the full dry suit ensemble worn by divers protected the wearer from the hazards of too much  pressure (hyperbarotrauma), today's aviation counterpart protects the occupant from the dangerous consequences of too little pressure at extreme altitude (hypobarotrauma). Interestingly, Dr. J. S. Haldane is credited, in 1920, with the first documented suggestion that a suit much like a diver's ensemble could probably be devised which would serve to protect an aviator at high altitudes.

 

Serious study into methods and technology which would protect aviators from the effects of increased altitude did not begin until the early 1930s, although the idea of full coverage (but non-pressurized) protective aviator's clothing has been with us virtually from the onset of heavier-than-air flight. Whereas prior to that time high altitude flight beyond 20,000 feet was practically limited by operational inadequacies of the conventionally carbureted piston-driven aero engines of the time, the development of the aircraft supercharger in the 1920s dramatically opened up this previously forbidding area of the skies that lay above the Troposphere. Suddenly, aircraft could fly up to 36,000 feet or higher and the chief concern was no longer how to keep the aviator insulated from the effects of severe cold, but how to protect him from the effects of lowered oxygen partial pressure that characterizes supra-troposphere regions.

 

In the United States of the early 1930s, an innovative individual named Mark E. Ridge determined that a pressurized suit, if suitably constructed, would allow him to make a record breaking ascent into the Stratosphere safely in an open balloon. His efforts to interest the American military departments in this endeavor failed, however, and so he turned to renown physiologist Dr. John Haldane in London, where Haldane had been working with Sir Robert Davis of Siebe, Gorman & Company on developmental deep sea diving suits. Together, Haldane and Davis constructed a hypobaric protection suit for Ridge from a substantially altered diving suit. For a number of reasons, Ridge was never able to put the suit to an actual test, although it was tested in Haldane's pressure chamber at simulated altitudes of up to 90,000 feet (somewhat later, a suit based upon the Ridge-Haldane-Davis design was later flown to a British altitude record of 50,000 feet by a Royal Air Force Lieutenant in 1936, as Haldane continued his work in altitude physiology inspired, in part, by Ridge's interest in a concept they both shared).

 

Click on Picture to enlarge

Another American pioneer aviator of the era was famed aviator Wiley Post, who in 1934 commissioned the B.F.Goodrich Company to manufacture an early pressure suit of Post's own design. The suit, which was at first unsuccessful, was modified by B. F. Goodrich engineer Russell Colley to enable it to hold 2.5 PSIG of pressure (0.85 kg/cm2); after further development of the rubberized fabric and aluminum helmeted suit, Post was finally able to wear it successfully on several record breaking flights to altitudes of 50,000 feet in 1934.

 

The decade of the 30s, coinciding with the rising fascist tensions in an increasingly militant Germany, finally began to see considerable international competition to set altitude records, as aeronautical engineering advances continued. Accordingly, interest in development of a protective pressurized garment which would allow record altitude attempts to be made safely finally began to take shape and Germany, Italy, England, Russia, France, Spain, Canada, the United States, and a host of other nations all instituted studies aimed at producing a safe and reliable pressurized suit. Among developments of the late 30s, Italy produced a semi-rigid suit which permitted access through an aperture in the back, and while it was found to be impracticable for use in flight due to the limits of rudimentary materials technology of the time, it presaged NASA's research studies for an extra-vehicular (EMU) suit for use with the American Space Shuttle in the '80s and '90s. Germany's aviation medicine institute also produced several designs from 1935 though 1945 and a number of other attempts at producing a high altitude protective garment were attempted by others.

 

As England continued its work with derivatives of the Ridge-Haldane-Davis suit, in the United States the US Army finally recognized, albeit somewhat belatedly, the potential importance of a fully pressurized protective garment for military aviators and started a classified research program in 1939, designated Project MX-117. Soon several US companies had been drawn into pressure suit developmental investigations; these included the B.F.Goodrich Company (Russell Colley's engineering group), Bell Aircraft Company, the Goodyear Rubber Company, the US Rubber Company, and the National Carbon Company. From 1940 through 1943 a  number of original designs were produced by all involved parties. Generally speaking, they uniformly featured transparent dome-like plastic helmets and airtight rubberized fabric garments which markedly restricted mobility and range of motion when fully pressurized. A major breakthrough came in the development of segmented, bellows-like joints at the knees, hips and elbows, which improved use of the limbs. This striking visual aspect of the early 40s suits resulted in their being termed "Tomato worm suits," after the distinctive convolutions of the Tomato Hornworm's body which had inspired the idea.

Click on Picture to enlarge

The US Army's program to develop high altitude pressure suits is purported to have been substantially motivated by a requirement to protect James Doolittle's B-25 Mitchell crews during their planned high altitude Tokyo air raid in 1941. With a change in plans which altered the high altitude penetration to a low-level one, the consequent overriding motivation to develop a suitable pressure suit for the Army Air Corps diminished considerably. The major limiting factor which resulted, in 1943, in the cancellation of the US Army's pressure suit program, was the fact that when fully inflated the suits became inflexible and rigid, thereby making it virtually impossible to perform the wide and complex range of motion tasks required to fly a modern combat aircraft.

 

Click on Picture to enlarge

Later, the US Navy began to investigate the full pressure suit possibilities in cooperation with the B. F. Goodrich Company and Russell Colley. This led to a progressive series of refinements in the basic full pressure suit design which would later (in the early 1950s) result in the first practical US military full pressure suit for operational use in high performance aircraft. Meanwhile, studies had been going on for some time to develop better anti-G garments for fighter pilots using the inflatable bladder principle. Also, Dr. James P. Henry of the University of Southern California was experimenting with a new concept in aircrew protection. His study of the operational requirements of aircrew tasks, the need to protect them from high altitude and the inadequacy of full pressure suit technology developments, led to the first of what have since become known as capstan type partial pressure  suits. Dr. Henry's partial pressure suit operated by imposing mechanical pressure on the body directly, compressing the abdomen and limbs in the manner of a G-suit through the use of inflatable bladders in the abdominal area and pneumatic tubes (capstans) running along the limbs. The wearer's head was fully enclosed in a tightly fitting, rubber lined fabric hood, the oronasal component of which featured a discrete area in front of the face, fitted with a transparent visor and fed by oxygen delivered through a corrugated rubber hose (the facial assembly of this early helmet has the appearance of full-face, rubberized oronasal chemical and biological respirators in use today).

 

Although the David Clark Company had been approached initially by Dr. Henry to help develop his suit concept, David Clark anti-G protection contracts for the US government made direct cooperation difficult. Rather, materials and a skilled technical assistant were made available by the company to allow Dr. Henry to continue his development in California. As a result of continued testing, many improvements in the design were suggested. These recommendations ultimately resulted in the David Clark produced T-1 suit, the first standardized mechanical principle type suit authorized for use to protect US Air Force aircrew from the combined effects of depressurization and G forces. The T-1 suit incorporated anti-G protection but no chest bladder. A development variant of the T-1 was the S-2 partial pressure suit, which evolved originally for use in bomber aircraft although it was also used in experimental aircraft test projects. The S-2 suit had no anti-G or chest bladders. In 1951 the US Air Force authorized limited production of the S-2 suit for certain projects, but it was the T-1 suit which figured most prominently in the first high altitude jet and rocket propelled aircraft experiments of the late 40s and early 50s

 

Click on Picture to enlarge

The original helmet used with the T-1 suit was designated the K-1 helmet. It consisted of a snug, laced nylon hood which was worn with a two-piece, close fitting, two-part white outer shell; a further improvement of the K-1 helmet made use of a substantially larger, one-piece green fiberglass outer shell. An upgraded version of the improved K-1 helmet was designated the MA-2 helmet (it featured a white painted version of the improved K-1 fiberglass shell, had an AIC-10 communication set-up, and used an improved, high-pressure oxygen delivery hose on its faceplate). Virtually indistinguishable from the later K-1 helmet except for AIC-10 headset was the MB-5 helmet. 

All the early partial pressure suits were extremely tight fitting and therefore were quite uncomfortable in prolonged use; the reduced comfort of the so-called "Henry suit" was an unfortunate aspect of subsequent developments of the T-1 and S-2 suits, designated the MC-1, MC-3 and MC-4 series models (the MC-2 type suits were experimental full pressure suits, about which more will follow), but the suits did accomplish their main purpose--to protect the wearer from the effects of emergency decompression at altitude. Later developments following the original partial pressure suit helmets resulted in the very different appearing MA-1 and MA-3 series helmets, which were far more comfortable designs that integrated helmet internal protection and sizing components into a single assembly (featuring a moveable transparent visor) that could be worn with both full pressure and partial pressure type suits. Ironically, developments of ensuing decades would come full circle with a return from the ‘long-term’ survival concept that  was then taking hold, to the original ‘get-me-down’ idea which had produced the earliest partial pressure designs.

 

Click on Picture to enlarge

It is a singularly interesting fact that in the early 1960s many of these partial pressure suits, specifically the T-1, MC-1 and MC-3 models--along with the improved K-1 helmet--were declassified and sold to the public as unneeded military equipment. Alert, interested individuals who encountered them by chance in military surplus stores, where they lay languishing in dingy cardboard cartons, could purchase them as curiosities for as little as a few dollars. Not long after this, however, the discarded partial pressure suits were again reclassified and hastily called up from the surplus outlets to be given to NATO nations under the US military assistance program to friendly powers. Despite this fact, a considerable number of these suits remain in the hands of military aeronautical memorabilia collectors to this day, dating from that brief period of Air Force oversight. Finally, few who saw them could ever forget the curious "Captain Company" advertisements--appearing in Forrest J. Ackerman's Famous Monsters of Filmland magazine--which offered new and unissued K-1 helmets for $15 and the partial pressure suits used with them for only $7.98!

 

By the early 1960s, the US Navy had progressed through a series of developmental models of the full pressure suit that would ultimately take final form in the Mark IV, Model 3, Type 1, a production suit which US Navy aircrew wore on high altitude flights during its cold weather operations. While the Mark IV Model 3 suit provided good protection, in 1954 the US Air Force elected to develop a full pressure suit based upon the B. F. Goodrich / US Navy model H, a developmental precursor of the Navy Mk. IV. The Model H, as it stood, was unsuited to operational use, but from this juncture the Air Force Aeromedical Laboratory was ordered to initiate a program which would result in a full pressure suit that would meet Air Force requirements. The fact that the Navy, not long after, evolved the excellent Mark IV, Model 3 from its considerably less sophisticated developmental model forebears is today a moot point--interservice rivalry between the US Air Force and the US Navy undoubtedly figured to some extent in the Air Force's impatience with the pace of the Navy's painstaking program of full pressure suit development.

Whatever the political nuances involved, an invitation was made in 1955 by the US Air Force to a number of companies to submit full pressure suit designs for consideration. As a result, several contracts were awarded and two of the leading designs were designated the XMC-2-ILC (International Latex Corporation, or ILC) and the (David Clark) XMC-2-DC. While ILC would later figure significantly in subsequent protective suits for use in the American space program's orbital and lunar missions, the ILC proposal, utilizing the familiar tomato-worm" joint approach, was selected for funding by NASA, the David Clark Company design (XMC-2-DC) was chosen for Air Force research and continued concept exploration.  Later, the David Clark Corporation succeeded in bringing about a major breakthrough in suit design through the use of an inner nylon mesh (called linknet) to control inflation and enhance range of motion, thereby eliminating the need for the tomato-worm bellows at the limb joints. The David Clark XMC-2-DC prototype, although still in need of substantial development, evolved into the MC-2 suit and then into a standardized Air Force high altitude, full pressure garment known as the A/P22S-2 model. (Interestingly, the Soviet Union had reportedly encountered markedly similar "control" problems in the development of their full pressure suits for space use. Curiously, however, the Russian VKK-4 and -6Ms partial pressure suits, as used with their aluminum GSh-4 and -6 helmets in such aircraft types as the MiG-21, bear more than superficial similarity to the American capstan-type mechanical partial pressure suits. No such similar or congruent design conformities, coincidental or otherwise, appear to exist with regard to US and Soviet full pressure suit developments. This is partly explained by the fact that the Soviets never developed full pressure suits for military aviation applications, although some conjecture still remains to this day as to whether or not any US suit technology was compromised during the original American-Soviet cooperative orbital missions
 
Concurrent with USAF decision to develop the A/P22S-2 from the MC-2 suit, the US Navy's final Mark IV suit was determined to be compatible with US Air Force aircraft cockpits as an interim suit, after certain changes had been made to it. This suit was accepted as a limited production Air Force FPS designated the A/P22S-3 model, and was intended for use until the A/P22S-2 model was finally found to be ready for standardization. Interestingly, the A/P22S-2 suit is regarded by most as the direct precursor design inspiration for NASA's Gemini mission suits, while the US Navy Mark IV suit was the precursor inspiration for the first US orbital (Project Mercury) space suits used in the original American space flights. 

 

Click on Picture to enlarge

The Air Force's MC-2 suit underwent, thereafter, a number of one-off 'dash' modifications for use in various high performance experimental aircraft testing programs and was extensively altitudes of 107,960 meters. Cine and still photographs of that era (60s) often show experimental test pilots dressed in the ubiquitous aluminized fabric covered (David Clark produced) MC-2 type full pressure suits as they tested aircraft at the limits of space. The primary standard Air Force design which derived from the MC-2, the A/P22S-2 suit, evolved into a series of variant models designated A/P22S-4, A/P22S-6 and A/P22s-6A (David Clark designations for the USAF High Altitude Flying Outfit A/P22S-6 and HAFO A/P22S-6A were S1024 and S1024B, respectively). The distinctive aluminized fabric outer layer which visually characterized the experimental aircraft project MC-2 type suits was intended to provide ultraviolet and thermal radiation protection for pilots. This feature was also used on the Project Mercury suits and appears to have captured the imagination of Hollywood's movie makers, as seemingly every science fiction film of the 1970s period depicts characters dressed in silvered 'space suits'.   

 

Click on Picture to enlarge

Regardless of the success of the A/P22S-2 suit and its modifications in Air Force use, it remained to the US Navy's cooperative program with the B. F. Goodrich Company and pioneer suit designer Russell Colley to solve some important problems concerning mobility and full pressurization. One of the most important developments was an aneroid suit controller that maintained suit internal pressurization at precisely 3.5 PSIG. The Mark series of US Navy full pressure suits which followed and were developed from alphanumeric developmental models, included the bulky Mark I (1956), a lighter, slightly reconfigured suit known as the Mark II, an even lighter Mark III suit (some versions with gold lamé outer layer) with improved internal ventilation system, and three models of the final Mark IV suit, which went into production in 1958 as standard high altitude issue for US Navy squadrons. The Mark IV, Model 3, Type 1 suit featured various enhancements in fit and ease of donning, as well as substantially improved pressurization control. It would go on to be selected as the basic foundation for modification into NASA's early earth-orbital suit (the original Mercury prototype suits were specially reworked Mark IV suits (NASA designated them XN-1 through XN-4 models, but they were referred to by engineers as the "quick fix" suits). 
 
In March of 1972, the US Air Force was officially designated as the lead command (Life Support Special Project Office--LSPRO) for the management of development, acquisition and logistics support efforts involving pressure suits for the US Department of Defense, although a US Naval life support systems representative (through Naval Air Development Center in Warminster, Pennsylvania) was given liaison affiliation to ensure Air Force/Navy compatibility. This resulted in the US Navy agreeing to give up use of its own substantially developed (Mk. IV) full pressure suit assemblies and adopting US Air Force developed suits for its operational requirement. Political circumstances undoubtedly figured significantly in many such decisions made in an era marked by increasing US Department of Defense (DoD) efforts to standardize and commonize materièl needs and requirements for the various US Armed Services. This decision was also a response to the question of which service would assume the lead in US aerospace developments, since many of the programs being conducted by the Air Force and Navy were needlessly redundant. (The best example of this political philosophy at work was perhaps the so-called TFX program, which ultimately resulted in production of the excellent General Dynamics F111---but only after many years of controversial, problem-plagued development, directly related to attempting to meet the diverse needs of two services with a single, basic system, and the ultimate rejection of the US Navy version of the aircraft as unsuited to its mission requirements.) 
 
Today, the standard high altitude full pressure suits used in almost all atmospheric flight operations, as well as those used in the space shuttle launch-entry mode, are manufactured by David Clark Company of Worcester, Massachusetts, long a leader in anti-G and pressure suit research and development. David Clark Company suits are used, as they have been for many years now, in the Lockheed SR-71 and U-2 type (both military and NASA) reconnaissance aircraft and all space shuttle
crew members go into orbit and reenter the atmosphere in garments sharing many similarities derived from their S1030 and S1010 series relations. 

 

Click on Picture to enlarge

Having evolved from its remote ancestor, the original David Clark XMC-2-DC suit first produced in 1956, the Pilot's Protective Assembly (PPA) model S901 worn by the first SR-71 crews, was initially produced for the Lockheed A-12 program in the early 60s. This garment evolved through several improved models that resulted in the S1030 suit, which was developed in the 1970s for SR-71 Blackbird operations. A special variant designated the S1010 PPA was developed specifically for use in the U-2R aircraft in the mid 1960s; this and several S1010 dash variants were later replaced by a further advanced model, the S1031 PPA. In the early 1980s efforts to produce a standard single suit capable of being used by both SR-71 and U-2 crews, yielded the S1031C suit, replacing earlier suits on an attrition basis. The very latest David Clark model S1034 PPA is an advanced lightweight full pressure suit which replaces the S1031C (common SR-71/U-2 design) suit and offers significant performance improvements, including enhanced pilot comfort, ease of donning and reduced stress-fatigue. First flown on 20 June 1991, the S1034 PPA will ultimately replace all earlier David Clark S-series suits in use by the US Air Force (which are design engineered for an approximate 10 year use/life-span). 

 

Click on Picture to enlarge

The earlier David Clark S1030C and S1010B suits were precisely fabricated, multi-layered garments, weighing about 35 pounds each and available in 12 standard sizes. When they were first produced in the late 1970s, each individual assembly initially cost the US Government over $30,000. The per-unit purchase cost of the newer S1031C PPA was nearer $100,000 and the expense of completely rebuilding one is almost as much as buying the newer version. The seven layers of specialized protection included long underwear, a comfort liner, a ventilation layer, a double-walled pressure containment layer, a restraint layer and a gold fabric outer layer (the gold-orange color of which is officially referred to as 'old gold'). The helmet featured an internal sizing and fitting system originally pioneered by the US Navy in its FPS developments of the late 1950s and has a sealing (clear) and non-sealing (tinted) visor; tubular ports for entrainment of special food and fluids in extruded aluminum squeeze tubes are provided in the chin area. Donning of the earliest suits took about 45 minutes with the help of two technicians and the services of the PSD (Physiological Support Division), although the donning time has now been substantially reduced in the latest model S1034 PPA. Many of the features of the suits were advancements of systems pioneered in earlier precursors made by the David Clark Company subsequent to the introduction of the archetypal XMC-2-DC model (precursor of the USAF A/P22S-2 suit, used extensively in the X-15 project) with vastly improved, new-generational systems developed from original combined US Air Force and US Navy FPS research programs. The latest of the S-series suits, of which the S1031C PPA is a good example, are equipped with a urine collection system that permits excreted urine to be dispersed in special lower leg semi-solidification storage areas; each is integrated to an outer combined parachute harness/vest assembly fabricated from the same 'old gold' colored material as the outer layer of the suit (the harness/vest assembly incorporates a life preserver system and automatic seawater-activated parachute riser releases called SEAWARS fittings). Maintaining internal pressurization at a constant 3.5 PSIG utilizing considerably advanced generational developments of the original US Navy aneroid type suit controller principle, the David Clark suits have been protecting pilots of the SR-71 and U-2 type aircraft at high altitude for somewhat over four decades. 

 

Click on Picture to enlarge

As noted earlier in the text, the first 4 flights of NASA's STS Orbiter were made with test crews of 2 persons, each wearing the special S1030A (modified Blackbird PPA known as the Ejection Escape Suit, or EES) assembly and seated in specially adapted SR-71 ejection seats. US Space Shuttle crews on operational flights (STS-5 through Mission 51-L) wore no special protective pressure garments. Instead, regulation NASA blue flight coveralls were worn with the NASA LEH helmet (NASA designation LEH was given to the military AOH-1, an integrated oxygen helmet combination termed the Assembly Oxygen Helmet-1). The NASA LEH (Launch Entry Helmet) was a virtually unmodified US Navy HGU-20/P visored flight helmet that was donned via a unique "clam-shell" hinging mechanism that divided the helmet into joinable fore and aft, semi-hemispherical sections. It featured a discrete oronasal area (face seal) with a sealable, sliding face visor. (Note: The original HGU-20/P helmet had been developed by the US Navy from the USAF HGU-15/P helmet issued for use by interceptor aircrews, but had been discontinued in use after the faceplate-visor was found to severely limit peripheral vision in tactical combat situations.) The helmet provided emergency oxygen in the manner of a standard pressure-demand oxygen mask, as well as crash and smoke protection, and had the appearance of a full pressure helmet, although it was not. Subsequent to the US Navy's decision to phase the integrated oxygen helmet out, the design was somewhat later revived in an adopted  form by NASA for use on the early operational shuttle missions. This is the type of helmet assembly which was worn by the crew of the ill-fated Challenger space shuttle in 1986 and the crews which preceded them from the 5th STS flight through Mission 51-L. 

With the destruction of STS Mission 51-L on 28 January 1986, a 'fast track' program to provide astronaut high altitude protection was instituted by NASA. This resulted in the the multi-layer NASA Launch/Entry Suit (designated model S1032 LES by David Clark Company), which was developed to provide combined anti-G protection, emergency pressurization, anti-exposure protection, high altitude escape, and sea-survival for shuttle orbiter crews; these partial pressure (twin-walled bladder type) suits were used with a specially integrated parachute, emergency oxygen system and survival kit pack, worn on the back in combination with the suit. The LES, based upon proven technology pioneered in the 1960 USAF CSU-4/P bladder type partial pressure suit, was not used once the earth's atmosphere had been left behind, but provided protection during launch and reentry phases to enhance emergency survival in the event of a catastrophic shuttle malfunction in the Earth's atmosphere (for actual use in an orbital space environment, a highly specialized and entirely different system known as the EMU, or Extra-vehicular Mobility Unit suit, is utilized). Each LES garment weighed, with helmet, approximately 24 pounds (excluding parachute/survival pack).

The latest model shuttle crew suit is the Advanced Crew Escape Suit, or David Clark model S1035 ACES, which incorporates further refinements and is a true full pressure type garment developed, again, using proven & qualified technology from the most recent USAF Advanced Lightweight Pressure Suit (David Clark model S1034). This is the suit now worn on Launch/Entry phases of shuttle orbiter operations, replacing the earlier S1032 LES. The S1035 ACES began initial service use on NASA mission STS-64, 9 September 1994. 

 

Back in the air conditioned confines of the Edwards Flight Test Center PSD (which is the Edwards AFFTC unit, Detachment Two, of the 9th Reconnaissance Wing based at Beale AFB) our PSD life support host was elaborating further on the amazing protective capabilities of the David Clark full pressure suit for his guest from Finland...but thoughts of the hot apple-sauce 'food' tubes strangely persisted. The development of the definitive American high altitude protective flight ensemble over the past 50 years had somehow crystallized and then subordinated itself around the unique thought of heating one's lunch at 90,000 feet, while traveling in excess of three times the speed of sound in a fully enveloping, form-fitting personal cocoon. This novel mental picture somehow reminded us also of our own lunch, which was shortly going to consist of much more, it is pleasing to relate, than a squeeze tube full of hot, pulverized apple paste, in the Edwards AFFTC cafeteria! 

 

Addendum:  Just recently had the opportunity to view a 1950s Humphrey Bogart movie release entitled 'CHAIN LIGHTNING', in which Bogy plays a hot-shot flight test pilot who flight tests the new 'JA-3' experimental aircraft. The storyline and plot are typical late 40s drama, but central to the plot are two innovations that are of more than passing interest. The first is an aircrew escape pod, an actual functional design for which was not successfully developed until the 60s and 70s, and the second is a high altitude pressure suit. The pressure suit that Bogy uses in the film is fascinating, despite the fact that it is pure Hollywood conjecture. In the story, the aircraft company founder decides that Bogy's experimental JA-3 will make a transpolar flight at 2000 mph and 90,000 feet (remember, this is 1950)! Consequently, he orders a special pressure suit to be fabricated that will allow Bogy to survive at this altitude and Bogy is presented the completed suit, ready to don, just three days later. Based upon what we know today of the immense complexities of pressure suit and space suit design and fabrication, this is a most amusing, literally laughable development in the plot of this technologically dismissible but hugely entertaining film. The film is available on home video in the event anyone is interested in seeing what Hollywood conceived of as a viable escape system and high altitude protective ensemble in the earliest days of modern jet aviation.]

 

REFERENCES: 

US Chemical and Biological Defense Respirators: An Illustrated History,  
by the article's author Christopher T. Carey. 

BOOKS, MAGAZINES 

1)    Black Magic--America's Spy planes: SR-71A & U-2, Michael O'Leary and Eric Schultzinger, Motorbooks International, Osceola, WI, USA, 1989 (ISBN: 0-879-38-358-5). 
 
2)    "The Development of the Partial Pressure Suit" (paper), excerpted from a collection of the memoirs of David M. Clark, a cooperative publication by the US Air Force Armstrong Laboratory and the David Clark Company, 1992. 
 
3)    "High Altitude Pressure Protective Equipment: A Historical Perspective" (paper), Dr. William J. Sears, Col, USAF (Ret), Proceedings of the Workshop on Life Support and Physiological Issues of Flight at 60,000 Feet and Above, co-edited by A.A. Pilmanis and William J. Sears, published by the US Air Force Armstrong Laboratory, Brooks AFB, Texas, 1995. 
 
4)    NAMC-ACEL-343, Omni-environmental Full Pressure Suit, B.F. Goodrich Model Suits, Report on, TED NAM AE-5101, James Correalle, et al, 28 April 1958 (special publication). 
 
5)    "The Pressure Suit," Don Towner, (article) Parachutist, Volume 12, Number 7, July 1971, Monterey, CA. 
 
6)    SR-71 Pilot's (Flight) Manual, Motorbooks International, Osceola, WI, USA, 1992 (ISBN: 0-87938-658-4). 
 
7)     US Aircrew Combat, Flight & Survival Gear, Hans & Mike Halberstat, Motorbooks International, Osceola, WI, USA, 1996 (ISBN: 0-7603-0267-7). 
 
8)    US Space Gear: Outfitting the Astronaut, Lillian D. Kozloski, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1994 (ISBN: 0-87474-459-8)

CORRESPONDENCE, PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS 

1)    Bassick, Mr. John W., Executive VP, Director of R&D, David Clark Company, Worcester, MA. 
 
2)    Gilliam, Mr. Dennis, Pressure Suit Historian, personal correspondence & communication, Riverside, CA. 
 
3)    Young, Dr. James, Chief Historian, Aerospace History Office, Edwards AFB (AFFTC), CA. 


  [PHOTO CREDITS: 

Smithsonian Air & Space Museum, NASA, and The David Clark Co., to whom we extend grateful appreciation for providing photographic documentation for this article.] Audio track: Courtesy of James Chas. Kaelin at http://www.earthstation1.com/ .

Courtesy of  AEOLUS AEROSPACE

 

 

USE YOUR BROWSER "BACK" BUTTON TO RETURN TO PERVIOUS PAGE

Last Updated

02/10/2014

 

POWERED BY

456FIS.ORG